vault-link/docs/guide/limitations.md
2025-11-30 15:24:52 +00:00

5.2 KiB

Limitations

VaultLink works well for most Obsidian vaults, but has some constraints you should know about.

File Type Limitations

Mergeable Files

Only .md and .txt files get automatic conflict-free merging.

Other file types (images, PDFs, etc.) use last-write-wins:

User A updates diagram.png → Server stores version 1
User B updates diagram.png → Server stores version 2 (overwrites A's changes)

Workaround: Avoid editing the same non-text file simultaneously.

Binary Detection

Files are treated as binary if they:

  • Contain NUL bytes (0x00)
  • Fail UTF-8 validation

Binary files within .md or .txt extensions still get last-write-wins (no merge).

Performance Constraints

Server Limits (Configurable)

Resource Default Maximum Tested
Clients per vault 256 ~256
Database connections 12 20
Max file size 512 MB 4096 MB
Request timeout 60s 180s
WebSocket cursor timeout 60s 300s
Database busy timeout 3600s -

Vault Size

  • Small vaults (< 1000 files): Excellent performance
  • Medium vaults (1000-10000 files): Good performance
  • Large vaults (> 10000 files): Works, but initial sync slower

No hard file count limit—constrained by disk space and sync time.

Resource Usage

Rough estimates (varies by vault size and activity):

  • RAM: ~50-200 MB base + ~1-5 MB per active client
  • CPU: Low (< 5%) for typical usage, spikes during merges
  • Disk: Vault size + version history (grows over time)

Version History

Storage

  • All versions stored indefinitely (no automatic cleanup)
  • Each vault is a separate SQLite database
  • Deleted files marked as deleted (not purged)

Growth: Version history grows with every change. A 10 MB vault with frequent edits might grow to 100+ MB over months.

Cleanup: Manual only (see Advanced Configuration).

Implications

  • Disk usage grows over time
  • Database size affects backup time
  • No built-in retention policy

Merge Quality

Text Merging

VaultLink uses word-level tokenisation for merging:

Parent: "The quick brown fox"
User A: "The quick red fox"
User B: "The very quick brown fox"
Result: "The very quick red fox" ← Both changes preserved

Imperfect scenarios:

  • Complex nested Markdown (tables, code blocks)
  • Simultaneous edits to the same sentence
  • Large structural changes (moving sections around)

Result: Merged file might need manual cleanup in ~1-5% of concurrent edits.

Scalability

SQLite Limitations

  • One SQLite database per vault
  • Single-server architecture (no built-in clustering)
  • Write serialisation through database

For high concurrency: Consider multiple vaults instead of one massive shared vault.

Horizontal Scaling

Not currently supported. Running multiple servers requires manual vault partitioning.

Network Requirements

Latency

  • Real-time sync typically < 500ms on good connections
  • Mobile/slow networks: 1-5s latency possible
  • Timeout failures on very slow connections (> 60s)

Offline Behaviour

  • Clients queue changes locally
  • On reconnect, sync all changes since last connection
  • Conflicts resolved automatically (for mergeable files)

Limitation: No offline conflict preview—merged result appears after reconnect.

Security

No End-to-End Encryption

  • Server sees all file contents
  • Transport encryption only (WSS/TLS)
  • Trust your server

Workaround: Self-host on infrastructure you control.

Authentication

  • Token-based only (no OAuth, SAML, etc.)
  • Tokens configured in server config file
  • No runtime user management

Known Edge Cases

Simultaneous Deletes and Edits

User A deletes note.md
User B edits note.md
Result: Edit wins (file recreated with B's content)

Operational transformation prioritises content preservation.

Large File Uploads

Files > 100 MB may time out on slow connections. Increase response_timeout_seconds or split large files.

Mobile Sync

  • Mobile networks may drop WebSocket connections frequently
  • Client auto-reconnects, but causes sync delays
  • Battery impact from constant reconnections
  • Not a backup solution: Version history helps but isn't a backup (make backups!)
  • Not Git: No branching, no commit messages, no diffs to review before merge
  • Not encrypted storage: Server sees everything
  • Not multi-master: One server, multiple clients (not peer-to-peer)

Recommendations

Good Use Cases

  • Personal multi-device sync (< 10 devices)
  • Small team collaboration (< 20 people)
  • Primarily text/Markdown content
  • Trusted server environment

Poor Use Cases

  • Large teams (> 50 concurrent users per vault)
  • Primarily binary files (images, videos, large PDFs)
  • Untrusted server (need E2E encryption)
  • Highly regulated environments (HIPAA, etc.)

Next Steps