perfect-postcode/growth/outreach-emails.md
2026-07-03 19:27:02 +01:00

86 lines
5.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Outreach: newsletters / podcasts / journalists (one-shot batch)
**Send once. Not a sequence. ~1215 emails, each personalised, from your own address.**
The pitch is the **finding**, never the product. You're offering a free, citable, ready-made data
asset (table + CSV + chart + a methodology box). Give **exactly one** outlet a genuine first-look
window; tell them so (it makes the exclusive worth covering).
**What you attach / link to every time**
- A clean comparison table (top "name premiums" / cheaper twins, national + their-audience cut)
- The same data as CSV
- One chart image (the OG card render works)
- A link to the live worked-example page: `https://perfect-postcode.co.uk/{{FLAGSHIP_TWIN_SLUG}}`
- The attribution line: *"Contains HM Land Registry data © Crown copyright and database right {{YEAR}}, OGL v3.0."*
**Numbers to fill from the harness:** `{{NATIONAL_HEADLINE_STAT}}`, `{{BIGGEST_TWIN_GAP}}`,
`{{TOP5_TWINS_TABLE}}`, `{{AUDIENCE_SPECIFIC_CUT}}`.
---
## Master template
**Subject:** `Data: the "cheaper twin" postcodes that share a school + station, {{BIGGEST_TWIN_GAP}} apart`
> Hi {{FirstName}},
>
> I built a dataset that joins HM Land Registry sold prices with EPC floor areas, Ofsted catchments,
> DfT commute times and Police.uk crime for **every postcode in England**, and it surfaces something
> I think your {{readers/listeners}} would find useful: **"cheaper twins."**
>
> These are pairs of neighbouring postcodes that share the same station, the same school catchment and
> the same era of housing, yet sell **tens of thousands apart**, purely because one name got bid up.
> Example: {{FLAGSHIP_TWIN_ONE_LINER}}. Nationally, the biggest gap I found is **{{BIGGEST_TWIN_GAP}}**.
>
> It's all official open data (OGL), aggregated to postcode level. Happy to send you a **ready-to-use
> table + CSV + chart**, including a cut specific to {{their audience/region}}. No ask in return; credit
> to *Perfect Postcode* with a link is plenty. I can give you a **first look before I share it more widely**
> if it's useful.
>
> Want me to send it over?
>
> {{Your name}}
> perfect-postcode.co.uk · {{your email}}
Keep it under ~150 words. No attachments on the *first* email (deliverability); offer, then send on reply.
---
## Targets (personalise the hook line per outlet)
### Consumer money / personal finance
1. **Andy Webb, Be Clever With Your Cash** (blog + newsletter + YouTube). Hook: the "are you overpaying for the name?" angle is squarely his money-saving lens. Consumer-friendly cut.
2. **Damien Fahy, Money to the Masses** (site + podcast). Hook: offer a podcast-ready segment ("how to find the cheaper twin of any postcode") + the data table.
3. **Finimize** (newsletter, large UK retail-finance audience). Hook: one punchy chart + the national headline stat; they run short data-led items.
4. **iNews / Metro money desk** (consumer national). Hook: "the postcode name premium", relatable, shareable, map-friendly.
### Property-buyer / homeowner
5. **HomeOwners Alliance** (consumer property advice + newsletter). Hook: pre-viewing research angle; their audience is active buyers.
6. **Charlie Lamdin, Moving Home with Charlie** (YouTube + BestAgent). Hook: he covers market value + buyer strategy daily; offer him the data for a "cheaper twin" episode (he'll likely screen-share the map).
7. **Rob Bence & Rob Dix, The Property Podcast / Property Hub** (investor-leaning, large). Hook: the £/m² value-gap framing for investors hunting under-priced areas; offer a data segment + regional cuts.
### National money desks (give ONE of these the exclusive first-look)
8. **Helen Crane, This is Money** ("Crane on the Case" / property). Hook: strong property-data appetite; the cleanest national-exclusive target.
9. **Ed Magnus, This is Money.** Hook: writes the data-led property explainers; alternative/second TiM contact.
10. **The Telegraph Money / The Times Money property desk** (one named property reporter each). Hook: "name premium" maps to their readership well, but paywalled, lower referral; pitch only if you have a name.
### Trade press (fast pickup, good backlinks, lower direct traffic)
11. **PropertyWire** (property trade news). Hook: ready-made data story, they publish data fast.
12. **The Negotiator / Estate Agent Today** (agent trade). Hook: "what buyers are about to start asking you about £/m²" angle.
13. **Property118** (landlord/investor community). Hook: value-gap data for portfolio buyers.
### Stretch (one shot, low odds, high payoff)
14. **MoneySavingExpert news team** (not the forum, the editorial desk). Hook: a genuinely novel free consumer data tool; they occasionally cover these. No forum self-promo.
15. **BBC / regional data journalism**: only if a finding is genuinely striking nationally; otherwise leave regional to `regional-tables.md`.
---
## Sequencing (do it in ~2 hours, once)
1. Pick your **one exclusive** (recommend Helen Crane / This is Money). Email them first, say "first look, ~5 days before I share wider."
2. Wait for a yes/no or ~5 days.
3. Send the rest in one sitting. Personalise only the **hook line**; keep the body identical.
4. Reply fast to anyone who bites; send the table+CSV+chart on reply.
5. Log every pickup (URL + do-follow?) in your metrics sheet; these backlinks are the real prize.
**Do not** chase more than one polite follow-up. Do not BCC a blast (kills deliverability and goodwill).