andras/great-ai
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests 1 Projects Releases 4 Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Deployed 69f2f6d with MkDocs version: 1.3.1

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
2022-08-04 14:01:36 +00:00
parent 293488d180
commit 80eaf72cf7
16 changed files with 164 additions and 140 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
thesis/chapters/0_abstract.tex
View file

@ -1,16 +1,14 @@
\begin{abstract}
\absdiv{Background}
Despite its long-standing history, artificial intelligence (AI) has only recently started enjoying widespread industry awareness and adoption; partly thanks to the prevalence of frameworks accessibly exposing state-of-the-art models. In order to achieve robust production deployments, the successful integration of AI components demands strong engineering methods. Concerningly, a tendency seems to be unfolding: even though professionals already have access to frameworks for deploying AI correctly and responsibly, case studies and developer surveys have found that a large fraction of deployments do not follow best practices.
Despite its long-standing history, artificial intelligence (AI) has only recently started enjoying widespread industry awareness and adoption; partly thanks to the prevalence of frameworks accessibly exposing state-of-the-art models. In order to achieve robust production deployments, the successful integration of AI components demands strong engineering methods. Concerningly, a tendency seems to be unfolding: even though professionals already have access to frameworks for deploying AI correctly, case studies and developer surveys have found that many deployments do not follow best practices.
\absdiv{Objective}
This thesis sets out to investigate the reasons behind the asymmetry between the adoption of accessible AI libraries and existing reusable solutions to robust deployments. A software framework called \textit{GreatAI} is designed which aims to facilitate \underline{G}eneral \underline{R}obust \underline{E}nd-to-end \underline{A}utomated \underline{T}rustworthy AI deployments while attempting to overcome the practical drawbacks of its predecessors.
\absdiv{Method}
The utility of \textit{GreatAI} is validated using the principles of design science methodology through iteratively designing its API and implementation in a case study of a commercial text mining pipeline. Subsequently, interviews are conducted with practitioners for validating the generalisability of the design.
The utility of \textit{GreatAI} is validated by applying the principles of design science methodology through iteratively designing it in a case study of a commercial text mining pipeline. Subsequently, interviews are conducted with practitioners for validating the generalisability of the design.
\absdiv{Results}
To do.
\absdiv{Conclusions}
To do.
\keywords{SE4ML \and AI engineering \and Trustworthy AI \and Deployment \and Text mining}
\end{abstract}