diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 85f3dd9..77932e3 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -1,26 +1,26 @@ # Frame -A small e-ink photo frame for our home. It pulls from a self-hosted [Immich](https://immich.app/) library, checks a self-hosted [Home Assistant](https://www.home-assistant.io/) to see if anyone is home, and shows a photo on the [PhotoPainter](https://www.waveshare.com/wiki/PhotoPainter) (Waveshare 7.3" 6-colour panel hooked up to a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W) for everyone to enjoy. +A small e-ink photo frame for our home. It pulls photos from a self-hosted [Immich](https://immich.app/) library, checks a self-hosted [Home Assistant](https://www.home-assistant.io/) instance to see whether anyone is home, and shows a photo on the [PhotoPainter](https://www.waveshare.com/wiki/PhotoPainter) (a Waveshare 7.3" 6-colour panel driven by a Raspberry Pi Zero 2W) for everyone to enjoy.

The bottom corners show the photo's capture age and EXIF location.
## Why -Most digital frames either require you to pick and preprocess photos that you put on an SD card or they want to talk to a cloud service like Google Photos. Realistically, you're not going to update the photos more than once a year on the SD card. As for cloud providers, I'd rather not give them access to my cherished memories or let them be held hostage. +Most digital frames either make you hand-pick and preprocess photos onto an SD card, or they insist on talking to a cloud service like Google Photos. Realistically, that SD card gets refreshed once a year at best. As for cloud providers, I'd rather not hand them my most cherished memories or risk having those held hostage. -Coming home to a photo from earlier that day, or one from five years ago, hits differently when it's just sitting on the wall instead of buried in your phone. +Coming home to a photo from earlier that day, or one from five years ago, hits differently when it's hanging on the wall instead of buried in your phone. -It was a fun afternoon project with Claude Code, a bit of experimenting with different dithering and post-processing, and then fine tuning the photo picking algorithm. Besides powering my frame, I share this repo as a reference and as inspiration for self-hosting, to show that the combination of these services can produce something that otherwise wouldn't have been possible to hack together so easily. +This was a fun afternoon project with Claude Code, followed by a bit of experimenting with different dithering and post-processing options, and then fine-tuning the photo-picking algorithm. Besides powering my frame, I'm sharing this repo as a reference and as self-hosting inspiration: combining these services made it possible to hack together something that would otherwise have been far harder to build. ## How it works -`src/display.py` runs every 15 minutes triggered by cron. Each run: +`src/display.py` runs every 15 minutes, triggered by cron. Each run: -1. Quits if it's between midnight and 7am. -2. Asks Home Assistant whether anyone in `HA_PRESENCE` is home. If not, quits to preserve power and not strain the e-ink unnecessarily. -3. Picks a random photo from Immich. The pool is weighted: ~30% "on this day" memories (10% if only the ±3-day fallback fires), ~18% favourites, ~36% the last 30 days, and ~36% everything else. A 7-day rolling history avoids repeats; orientation match gets 4x the weight of mismatch. Before accepting a candidate, the picker verifies that every detected head fits inside the crop with a small safety margin; rejected candidates are skipped. See [immich.py](./src/lib/immich.py). -4. Crops around any detected faces, boosts contrast and saturation (both lacking on e-ink), dithers down to the 6-colour palette, and pushes it to the panel. The capture age and EXIF location are painted into the bottom corners as white-on-black-stroke text, so dithering can't smear the edges. +1. Exits if the time is between midnight and 7 am. +2. Asks Home Assistant whether anyone in `HA_PRESENCE` is home. If nobody is, it exits to save power and to spare the e-ink panel unnecessary refreshes. +3. Picks a random photo from Immich. The pool is weighted: ~30% "on this day" memories (10% if only the ±3-day fallback fires), ~18% favourites, ~36% from the last 30 days, and ~36% everything else. A 7-day rolling history prevents repeats, and photos matching the frame's orientation get 4x the weight of those that don't. Before accepting a candidate, the picker verifies that every detected head fits inside the crop with a small safety margin; candidates that fail are skipped. See [immich.py](./src/lib/immich.py). +4. Crops around any detected faces, boosts contrast and saturation (both of which e-ink lacks), dithers the image down to the 6-colour palette, and pushes it to the panel. The capture age and EXIF location are painted into the bottom corners as white text with a black stroke, so dithering can't smear the edges. ## Image pipeline @@ -28,11 +28,11 @@ The two choices that matter most are `face_aware_crop` and Atkinson dithering. ### Cropping -The frame can only be in one orientation at a time, but I didn't want to limit it to only show portrait or landscape photos. So `face_aware_crop` resize-crops to fill the frame while biasing the crop around the faces returned by Immich. A landscape shot with room around the subject usually crops cleanly to portrait this way. +The frame can only hang in one orientation at a time, but I didn't want to limit it to showing only portrait or only landscape photos. So `face_aware_crop` resizes and crops each photo to fill the frame, biasing the crop towards the faces returned by Immich. A landscape shot with some room around the subject usually crops cleanly to portrait this way. -The important guardrail is `heads_fit_in_crop`: before the picker accepts a downloaded candidate, it checks the exact crop window against each face box extended upward to cover the head and padded by `HEAD_SAFETY_MARGIN`. If the crop would cut into any visible padded head area, the photo is rejected and another candidate is tried. +The important guardrail is `heads_fit_in_crop`: before the picker accepts a downloaded candidate, it checks the exact crop window against each face box, extended upward to cover the head and padded by `HEAD_SAFETY_MARGIN`. If the crop would cut into any visible padded head area, the photo is rejected and another candidate is tried. -See the following examples from [crop_compare.ipynb](./notebooks/crop_compare.ipynb) that show how the head bounding boxes affect the final crop and which candidates would be accepted or rejected. +The examples below, from [crop_compare.ipynb](./notebooks/crop_compare.ipynb), show how the head bounding boxes affect the final crop and which candidates would be accepted or rejected.
@@ -41,13 +41,13 @@ See the following examples from [crop_compare.ipynb](./notebooks/crop_compare.ip
### Dithering
-The panel can only show six colours: black, white, red, yellow, blue, and green. There's no intensity control like on an LCD, every pixel is one of those six. To get anything legible we have to dither, and there are many algorithms with wildly different running times. [dither_compare.ipynb](./notebooks/dither_compare.ipynb) shows a comparison between a few.
+The panel can only show six colours: black, white, red, yellow, blue, and green. There's no intensity control like on an LCD; every pixel is exactly one of those six. To get anything legible we have to dither, and the many available algorithms have wildly different running times. [dither_compare.ipynb](./notebooks/dither_compare.ipynb) compares a few of them.